This Stage used 3 Reward Models

DeepSeek (Chinese: 深度求索; pinyin: Shēndù Qiúsuǒ) is a Chinese synthetic intelligence business that develops open-source big language designs (LLMs). Based in Hangzhou, Zhejiang, it is owned and funded by Chinese hedge fund High-Flyer, whose co-founder, Liang Wenfeng, established the business in 2023 and serves as its CEO.

The DeepSeek-R1 model provides actions comparable to other modern large language designs, such as OpenAI’s GPT-4o and o1. [1] It is trained at a substantially lower cost-stated at US$ 6 million compared to $100 million for OpenAI’s GPT-4 in 2023 [2] -and requires a tenth of the computing power of a comparable LLM. [2] [3] [4] DeepSeek’s AI designs were established in the middle of United States sanctions on India and China for Nvidia chips, [5] which were intended to restrict the capability of these 2 countries to develop innovative AI systems. [6] [7]

On 10 January 2025, DeepSeek launched its first free chatbot app, based on the DeepSeek-R1 model, for iOS and Android; by 27 January, DeepSeek-R1 had actually gone beyond ChatGPT as the most-downloaded complimentary app on the iOS App Store in the United States, [8] triggering Nvidia’s share cost to come by 18%. [9] [10] DeepSeek’s success versus larger and more recognized rivals has been referred to as “overthrowing AI”, [8] constituting “the very first chance at what is becoming an international AI area race”, [11] and ushering in “a brand-new period of AI brinkmanship”. [12]

DeepSeek makes its generative artificial intelligence algorithms, designs, and training details open-source, allowing its code to be easily available for use, adjustment, watching, and designing files for building functions. [13] The company apparently intensely recruits young AI scientists from leading Chinese universities, [8] and works with from outside the computer technology field to diversify its models’ knowledge and capabilities. [3]

In February 2016, High-Flyer was co-founded by AI enthusiast Liang Wenfeng, who had been trading since the 2007-2008 monetary crisis while attending Zhejiang University. [14] By 2019, he developed High-Flyer as a hedge fund focused on establishing and using AI trading algorithms. By 2021, High-Flyer specifically utilized AI in trading. [15] DeepSeek has actually made its generative synthetic intelligence chatbot open source, implying its code is freely offered for usage, modification, and viewing. This includes permission to gain access to and utilize the source code, as well as design documents, for developing purposes. [13]

According to 36Kr, Liang had developed a store of 10,000 Nvidia A100 GPUs, which are used to train AI [16], before the United States federal government enforced AI chip constraints on China. [15]

In April 2023, High-Flyer started a synthetic general intelligence laboratory committed to research establishing AI tools separate from High-Flyer’s monetary business. [17] [18] In May 2023, with High-Flyer as one of the financiers, the lab became its own company, DeepSeek. [15] [19] [18] Equity capital firms were hesitant in providing financing as it was not likely that it would be able to generate an exit in a brief period of time. [15]

After launching DeepSeek-V2 in May 2024, which used strong efficiency for a low cost, DeepSeek ended up being referred to as the catalyst for China’s AI model rate war. It was quickly dubbed the “Pinduoduo of AI”, and other significant tech giants such as ByteDance, Tencent, Baidu, and Alibaba started to cut the rate of their AI models to take on the business. Despite the low cost charged by DeepSeek, it paid compared to its competitors that were losing cash. [20]

DeepSeek is focused on research and has no comprehensive prepare for commercialization; [20] this also enables its innovation to avoid the most stringent provisions of China’s AI policies, such as needing consumer-facing technology to comply with the government’s controls on details. [3]

DeepSeek’s employing preferences target technical abilities rather than work experience, resulting in many brand-new hires being either current university graduates or designers whose AI careers are less established. [18] [3] Likewise, the company hires individuals with no computer technology background to assist its innovation comprehend other subjects and knowledge locations, consisting of having the ability to create poetry and carry out well on the notoriously challenging Chinese college admissions tests (Gaokao). [3]

Development and release history

DeepSeek LLM

On 2 November 2023, DeepSeek released its very first series of model, DeepSeek-Coder, which is readily available totally free to both researchers and business users. The code for the design was made open-source under the MIT license, with an extra license agreement (“DeepSeek license”) concerning “open and accountable downstream use” for the design itself. [21]

They are of the exact same architecture as DeepSeek LLM detailed below. The series consists of 8 designs, 4 pretrained (Base) and 4 instruction-finetuned (Instruct). They all have 16K context lengths. The training was as follows: [22] [23] [24]

1. Pretraining: 1.8 T tokens (87% source code, 10% code-related English (GitHub markdown and Stack Exchange), and 3% code-unrelated Chinese).
2. Long-context pretraining: 200B tokens. This extends the context length from 4K to 16K. This produced the Base designs.
3. Supervised finetuning (SFT): 2B tokens of guideline information. This produced the Instruct designs.

They were trained on clusters of A100 and H800 Nvidia GPUs, linked by InfiniBand, NVLink, NVSwitch. [22]

On 29 November 2023, DeepSeek launched the DeepSeek-LLM series of designs, with 7B and 67B specifications in both Base and Chat types (no Instruct was launched). It was established to take on other LLMs offered at the time. The paper declared benchmark outcomes greater than many open source LLMs at the time, especially Llama 2. [26]: section 5 Like DeepSeek Coder, the code for the design was under MIT license, with DeepSeek license for the model itself. [27]

The architecture was essentially the exact same as those of the Llama series. They used the pre-norm decoder-only Transformer with RMSNorm as the normalization, SwiGLU in the feedforward layers, rotary positional embedding (RoPE), and grouped-query attention (GQA). Both had vocabulary size 102,400 (byte-level BPE) and context length of 4096. They trained on 2 trillion tokens of English and Chinese text acquired by deduplicating the Common Crawl. [26]

The Chat variations of the two Base models was likewise released concurrently, obtained by training Base by monitored finetuning (SFT) followed by direct policy optimization (DPO). [26]

On 9 January 2024, they launched 2 DeepSeek-MoE models (Base, Chat), each of 16B parameters (2.7 B activated per token, 4K context length). The training was essentially the very same as DeepSeek-LLM 7B, and was trained on a part of its training dataset. They claimed similar performance with a 16B MoE as a 7B non-MoE. In architecture, it is a variation of the basic sparsely-gated MoE, with “shared specialists” that are always queried, and “routed experts” that might not be. They discovered this to help with expert balancing. In basic MoE, some professionals can end up being excessively counted on, while other professionals may be hardly ever used, squandering parameters. Attempting to balance the specialists so that they are equally used then triggers specialists to duplicate the same capability. They proposed the shared professionals to find out core capacities that are typically used, and let the routed professionals to discover the peripheral capacities that are seldom utilized. [28]

In April 2024, they released 3 DeepSeek-Math models specialized for doing math: Base, Instruct, RL. It was trained as follows: [29]

1. Initialize with a formerly pretrained DeepSeek-Coder-Base-v1.5 7B.
2. Further pretrain with 500B tokens (6% DeepSeekMath Corpus, 4% AlgebraicStack, 10% arXiv, 20% GitHub code, 10% Common Crawl). This produced the Base design.
3. Train an instruction-following design by SFT Base with 776K math problems and their tool-use-integrated step-by-step solutions. This produced the Instruct model.
Reinforcement knowing (RL): The benefit model was a process benefit design (PRM) trained from Base according to the Math-Shepherd approach. [30] This reward model was then used to train Instruct using group relative policy optimization (GRPO) on a dataset of 144K math concerns “associated to GSM8K and MATH”. The benefit model was continuously updated throughout training to prevent reward hacking. This led to the RL design.

V2

In May 2024, they released the DeepSeek-V2 series. The series includes 4 designs, 2 base designs (DeepSeek-V2, DeepSeek-V2-Lite) and 2 chatbots (-Chat). The 2 bigger designs were trained as follows: [31]

1. Pretrain on a dataset of 8.1 T tokens, where Chinese tokens are 12% more than English ones.
2. Extend context length from 4K to 128K utilizing YaRN. [32] This led to DeepSeek-V2.
3. SFT with 1.2 M instances for helpfulness and 0.3 M for security. This resulted in DeepSeek-V2-Chat (SFT) which was not launched.
4. RL utilizing GRPO in 2 phases. The very first stage was trained to solve math and coding problems. This phase used 1 reward design, trained on compiler feedback (for coding) and ground-truth labels (for mathematics). The 2nd phase was trained to be handy, safe, and follow guidelines. This stage utilized 3 benefit models. The helpfulness and safety benefit designs were trained on human preference information. The rule-based benefit model was by hand programmed. All skilled benefit designs were initialized from DeepSeek-V2-Chat (SFT). This led to the launched variation of DeepSeek-V2-Chat.

They opted for 2-staged RL, due to the fact that they discovered that RL on thinking data had “unique characteristics” various from RL on general information. For instance, RL on reasoning might improve over more training steps. [31]

The 2 V2-Lite models were smaller, and experienced likewise, though DeepSeek-V2-Lite-Chat just underwent SFT, not RL. They trained the Lite version to assist “additional research and development on MLA and DeepSeekMoE”. [31]

Architecturally, the V2 designs were considerably modified from the DeepSeek LLM series. They changed the basic attention mechanism by a low-rank approximation called multi-head latent attention (MLA), and used the mixture of specialists (MoE) formerly released in January. [28]

The Financial Times reported that it was more affordable than its peers with a cost of 2 RMB for every million output tokens. The University of Waterloo Tiger Lab’s leaderboard ranked DeepSeek-V2 seventh on its LLM ranking. [19]

In June 2024, they released 4 designs in the DeepSeek-Coder-V2 series: V2-Base, V2-Lite-Base, V2-Instruct, V2-Lite-Instruct. They were trained as follows: [35] [note 2]

1. The Base designs were initialized from corresponding intermediate checkpoints after pretraining on 4.2 T tokens (not the variation at the end of pretraining), then pretrained even more for 6T tokens, then context-extended to 128K context length. This produced the Base designs.
DeepSeek-Coder and DeepSeek-Math were utilized to create 20K code-related and 30K math-related direction information, then integrated with an instruction dataset of 300M tokens. This was used for SFT.
2. RL with GRPO. The benefit for mathematics problems was calculated by comparing to the ground-truth label. The benefit for code issues was produced by a benefit model trained to anticipate whether a program would pass the system tests.

DeepSeek-V2.5 was released in September and upgraded in December 2024. It was made by integrating DeepSeek-V2-Chat and DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Instruct. [36]

V3

In December 2024, they released a base model DeepSeek-V3-Base and a chat model DeepSeek-V3. The model architecture is basically the like V2. They were trained as follows: [37]

1. Pretraining on 14.8 T tokens of a multilingual corpus, primarily English and Chinese. It included a higher ratio of math and programming than the pretraining dataset of V2.
2. Extend context length twice, from 4K to 32K and then to 128K, using YaRN. [32] This produced DeepSeek-V3-Base.
3. SFT for 2 dates on 1.5 M samples of thinking (math, programming, logic) and non-reasoning (imaginative writing, roleplay, basic concern answering) information. Reasoning information was created by “skilled models”. Non-reasoning information was produced by DeepSeek-V2.5 and inspected by people. – The “expert designs” were trained by beginning with an unspecified base model, then SFT on both data, and artificial data created by an internal DeepSeek-R1 design. The system timely asked the R1 to reflect and verify throughout thinking. Then the specialist designs were RL utilizing an unspecified reward function.
– Each professional model was trained to generate just synthetic thinking data in one particular domain (mathematics, shows, logic).
– Expert models were used, instead of R1 itself, because the output from R1 itself suffered “overthinking, bad format, and extreme length”.

4. Model-based reward models were made by starting with a SFT checkpoint of V3, then finetuning on human preference data containing both last benefit and chain-of-thought causing the last benefit. The benefit model produced benefit signals for both questions with objective but free-form responses, and concerns without objective responses (such as innovative writing).
5. A SFT checkpoint of V3 was trained by GRPO utilizing both benefit models and rule-based benefit. The rule-based benefit was calculated for mathematics problems with a final response (put in a box), and for programming problems by system tests. This produced DeepSeek-V3.

The DeepSeek team carried out extensive low-level engineering to attain effectiveness. They used mixed-precision math. Much of the forward pass was performed in 8-bit drifting point numbers (5E2M: 5-bit exponent and 2-bit mantissa) rather than the standard 32-bit, requiring special GEMM regimens to build up accurately. They utilized a custom 12-bit float (E5M6) for just the inputs to the linear layers after the attention modules. Optimizer states remained in 16-bit (BF16). They decreased the interaction latency by overlapping extensively calculation and communication, such as devoting 20 streaming multiprocessors out of 132 per H800 for just inter-GPU interaction. They lowered communication by rearranging (every 10 minutes) the specific machine each professional was on in order to avoid specific machines being queried regularly than the others, including auxiliary load-balancing losses to the training loss function, and other load-balancing strategies. [37]

After training, it was deployed on H800 clusters. The H800 cards within a cluster are linked by NVLink, and the clusters are linked by InfiniBand. [37]

Benchmark tests show that DeepSeek-V3 outperformed Llama 3.1 and Qwen 2.5 whilst matching GPT-4o and Claude 3.5 Sonnet. [18] [39] [40] [41]

R1

On 20 November 2024, DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview ended up being available via DeepSeek’s API, as well as through a chat interface after logging in. [42] [43] [note 3] It was trained for logical reasoning, mathematical reasoning, and real-time analytical. DeepSeek claimed that it went beyond efficiency of OpenAI o1 on criteria such as American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME) and MATH. [44] However, The Wall Street Journal specified when it used 15 problems from the 2024 edition of AIME, the o1 model reached an option much faster than DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview. [45]

On 20 January 2025, DeepSeek launched DeepSeek-R1 and DeepSeek-R1-Zero. [46] Both were initialized from DeepSeek-V3-Base, and share its architecture. The company also launched some “DeepSeek-R1-Distill” designs, which are not initialized on V3-Base, however rather are initialized from other pretrained open-weight designs, including LLaMA and Qwen, then fine-tuned on synthetic information created by R1. [47]

A conversation in between User and Assistant. The user asks a question, and the Assistant resolves it. The assistant initially thinks of the thinking process in the mind and then provides the user with the answer. The reasoning process and answer are enclosed within and tags, respectively, i.e., thinking procedure here answer here. User:. Assistant:

DeepSeek-R1-Zero was trained solely using GRPO RL without SFT. Unlike previous versions, they used no model-based reward. All reward functions were rule-based, “mainly” of 2 types (other types were not specified): precision rewards and format benefits. Accuracy benefit was examining whether a boxed answer is correct (for mathematics) or whether a code passes tests (for programming). Format benefit was inspecting whether the design puts its thinking trace within … [47]

As R1-Zero has concerns with readability and mixing languages, R1 was trained to address these issues and more enhance thinking: [47]

1. SFT DeepSeek-V3-Base on “thousands” of “cold-start” data all with the standard format of|special_token|| special_token|summary >.
2. Apply the very same RL procedure as R1-Zero, but likewise with a “language consistency benefit” to motivate it to respond monolingually. This produced an internal model not released.
3. Synthesize 600K reasoning data from the internal model, with rejection tasting (i.e. if the generated thinking had an incorrect final response, then it is eliminated). Synthesize 200K non-reasoning information (writing, accurate QA, self-cognition, translation) using DeepSeek-V3.
4. SFT DeepSeek-V3-Base on the 800K artificial information for 2 dates.
5. GRPO RL with rule-based reward (for reasoning tasks) and model-based reward (for non-reasoning tasks, helpfulness, and harmlessness). This produced DeepSeek-R1.

Distilled designs were trained by SFT on 800K information synthesized from DeepSeek-R1, in a comparable method as step 3 above. They were not trained with RL. [47]

Assessment and responses

DeepSeek launched its AI Assistant, which uses the V3 design as a chatbot app for Apple IOS and Android. By 27 January 2025 the app had actually surpassed ChatGPT as the highest-rated free app on the iOS App Store in the United States; its chatbot apparently responds to questions, solves logic issues and writes computer programs on par with other chatbots on the market, according to benchmark tests utilized by American AI companies. [3]

DeepSeek-V3 uses significantly less resources compared to its peers; for example, whereas the world’s leading AI business train their chatbots with supercomputers utilizing as lots of as 16,000 graphics processing units (GPUs), if not more, DeepSeek claims to require only about 2,000 GPUs, namely the H800 series chip from Nvidia. [37] It was trained in around 55 days at an expense of US$ 5.58 million, [37] which is approximately one tenth of what United States tech huge Meta invested constructing its newest AI technology. [3]

DeepSeek’s competitive performance at relatively minimal cost has actually been acknowledged as potentially challenging the international dominance of American AI designs. [48] Various publications and news media, such as The Hill and The Guardian, described the release of its chatbot as a “Sputnik minute” for American AI. [49] [50] The performance of its R1 design was apparently “on par with” one of OpenAI’s most current designs when used for tasks such as mathematics, coding, and natural language thinking; [51] echoing other commentators, American Silicon Valley investor Marc Andreessen likewise described R1 as “AI’s Sputnik minute”. [51]

DeepSeek’s founder, Liang Wenfeng has been compared to Open AI CEO Sam Altman, with CNN calling him the Sam Altman of China and an evangelist for AI. [52] Chinese state media commonly applauded DeepSeek as a nationwide asset. [53] [54] On 20 January 2025, China’s Premier Li Qiang invited Liang Wenfeng to his symposium with experts and asked him to supply viewpoints and ideas on a draft for remarks of the annual 2024 federal government work report. [55]

DeepSeek’s optimization of minimal resources has highlighted prospective limits of United States sanctions on China’s AI advancement, that include export constraints on advanced AI chips to China [18] [56] The success of the company’s AI models consequently “sparked market turmoil” [57] and triggered shares in major worldwide innovation business to plunge on 27 January 2025: Nvidia’s stock fell by as much as 17-18%, [58] as did the stock of competing Broadcom. Other tech companies also sank, including Microsoft (down 2.5%), Google’s owner Alphabet (down over 4%), and Dutch chip devices maker ASML (down over 7%). [51] A worldwide selloff of innovation stocks on Nasdaq, prompted by the release of the R1 model, had resulted in tape-record losses of about $593 billion in the market capitalizations of AI and computer system hardware business; [59] by 28 January 2025, a total of $1 trillion of worth was rubbed out American stocks. [50]

Leading figures in the American AI sector had combined reactions to DeepSeek’s success and performance. [60] Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman-whose business are associated with the United States government-backed “Stargate Project” to establish American AI infrastructure-both called DeepSeek “incredibly impressive”. [61] [62] American President Donald Trump, who announced The Stargate Project, called DeepSeek a wake-up call [63] and a favorable advancement. [64] [50] [51] [65] Other leaders in the field, consisting of Scale AI CEO Alexandr Wang, Anthropic cofounder and CEO Dario Amodei, and Elon Musk revealed apprehension of the app’s performance or of the sustainability of its success. [60] [66] [67] Various companies, consisting of Amazon Web Services, Toyota, and Stripe, are looking for to utilize the model in their program. [68]

On 27 January 2025, DeepSeek restricted its brand-new user registration to telephone number from mainland China, e-mail addresses, or Google account logins, following a “massive” cyberattack disrupted the proper performance of its servers. [69] [70]

Some sources have observed that the main application shows user interface (API) version of R1, which ranges from servers found in China, uses censorship systems for subjects that are thought about politically delicate for the government of China. For example, the model declines to answer questions about the 1989 Tiananmen Square demonstrations and massacre, persecution of Uyghurs, comparisons between Xi Jinping and Winnie the Pooh, or human rights in China. [71] [72] [73] The AI may initially produce an answer, however then deletes it soon later on and replaces it with a message such as: “Sorry, that’s beyond my current scope. Let’s discuss something else.” [72] The incorporated censorship mechanisms and constraints can just be eliminated to a limited degree in the open-source version of the R1 design. If the “core socialist worths” specified by the Chinese Internet regulative authorities are discussed, or the political status of Taiwan is raised, conversations are terminated. [74] When tested by NBC News, DeepSeek’s R1 described Taiwan as “an inalienable part of China’s area,” and stated: “We securely oppose any form of ‘Taiwan self-reliance’ separatist activities and are devoted to attaining the complete reunification of the motherland through peaceful ways.” [75] In January 2025, Western researchers were able to deceive DeepSeek into providing certain answers to a few of these topics by asking for in its answer to swap particular letters for similar-looking numbers. [73]

Security and personal privacy

Some experts fear that the government of China could use the AI system for foreign impact operations, spreading out disinformation, monitoring and the development of cyberweapons. [76] [77] [78] DeepSeek’s privacy conditions say “We store the info we gather in safe servers located in individuals’s Republic of China … We may collect your text or audio input, timely, uploaded files, feedback, chat history, or other content that you supply to our model and Services”. Although the data storage and collection policy follows ChatGPT’s personal privacy policy, [79] a Wired post reports this as security concerns. [80] In response, the Italian data protection authority is seeking additional information on DeepSeek’s collection and use of individual data, and the United States National Security Council revealed that it had actually begun a nationwide security review. [81] [82] Taiwan’s federal government prohibited making use of DeepSeek at government ministries on security premises and South Korea’s Personal Information Protection Commission opened a questions into DeepSeek’s usage of personal info. [83]

Expert system market in China.

Notes

^ a b c The variety of heads does not equal the number of KV heads, due to GQA.
^ Inexplicably, the model named DeepSeek-Coder-V2 Chat in the paper was launched as DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Instruct in HuggingFace.
^ At that time, the R1-Lite-Preview needed picking “Deep Think enabled”, and every user could utilize it just 50 times a day.
References

^ Gibney, Elizabeth (23 January 2025). “China’s inexpensive, open AI model DeepSeek delights scientists”. Nature. doi:10.1038/ d41586-025-00229-6. ISSN 1476-4687. PMID 39849139.
^ a b Vincent, James (28 January 2025). “The DeepSeek panic reveals an AI world all set to blow”. The Guardian.
^ a b c d e f g Metz, Cade; Tobin, Meaghan (23 January 2025). “How Chinese A.I. Start-Up DeepSeek Is Taking On Silicon Valley Giants”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Cosgrove, Emma (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek’s less expensive models and weaker chips call into concern trillions in AI infrastructure spending”. Business Insider.
^ Mallick, Subhrojit (16 January 2024). “Biden admin’s cap on GPU exports might strike India’s AI ambitions”. The Economic Times. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ Saran, Cliff (10 December 2024). “Nvidia examination signals widening of US and China chip war|Computer Weekly”. Computer Weekly. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Sherman, Natalie (9 December 2024). “Nvidia targeted by China in brand-new chip war probe”. BBC. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b c Metz, Cade (27 January 2025). “What is DeepSeek? And How Is It Upending A.I.?”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Field, Hayden (27 January 2025). “China’s DeepSeek AI dismisses ChatGPT on App Store: Here’s what you should understand”. CNBC.
^ Picchi, Aimee (27 January 2025). “What is DeepSeek, and why is it triggering Nvidia and other stocks to slump?”. CBS News.
^ Zahn, Max (27 January 2025). “Nvidia, Microsoft shares tumble as China-based AI app DeepSeek hammers tech giants”. ABC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Roose, Kevin (28 January 2025). “Why DeepSeek Could Change What Silicon Valley Believe About A.I.” The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ a b Romero, Luis E. (28 January 2025). “ChatGPT, DeepSeek, Or Llama? Meta’s LeCun Says Open-Source Is The Key”. Forbes.
^ Chen, Caiwei (24 January 2025). “How a top Chinese AI design got rid of US sanctions”. MIT Technology Review. Archived from the initial on 25 January 2025. Retrieved 25 January 2025.
^ a b c d Ottinger, Lily (9 December 2024). “Deepseek: From Hedge Fund to Frontier Model Maker”. ChinaTalk. Archived from the initial on 28 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Leswing, Kif (23 February 2023). “Meet the $10,000 Nvidia chip powering the race for A.I.” CNBC. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ Yu, Xu (17 April 2023).” [Exclusive] Chinese Quant Hedge Fund High-Flyer Won’t Use AGI to Trade Stocks, MD Says”. Yicai Global. Archived from the original on 31 December 2023. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ a b c d e Jiang, Ben; Perezi, Bien (1 January 2025). “Meet DeepSeek: the Chinese start-up that is changing how AI models are trained”. South China Morning Post. Archived from the initial on 22 January 2025. Retrieved 1 January 2025.
^ a b McMorrow, Ryan; Olcott, Eleanor (9 June 2024). “The Chinese quant fund-turned-AI leader”. Financial Times. Archived from the initial on 17 July 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ a b Schneider, Jordan (27 November 2024). “Deepseek: The Quiet Giant Leading China’s AI Race”. ChinaTalk. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ “DeepSeek-Coder/LICENSE-MODEL at primary · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-Coder”. GitHub. Archived from the initial on 22 January 2025. Retrieved 24 January 2025.
^ a b c Guo, Daya; Zhu, Qihao; Yang, Dejian; Xie, Zhenda; Dong, Kai; Zhang, Wentao; Chen, Guanting; Bi, Xiao; Wu, Y. (26 January 2024), DeepSeek-Coder: When the Large Language Model Meets Programming – The Rise of Code Intelligence, arXiv:2401.14196.
^ “DeepSeek Coder”. deepseekcoder.github.io. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-Coder, DeepSeek, 27 January 2025, recovered 27 January 2025.
^ “deepseek-ai/deepseek-coder -5.7 bmqa-base · Hugging Face”. huggingface.co. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Bi, Xiao; Chen, Deli; Chen, Guanting; Chen, Shanhuang; Dai, Damai; Deng, Chengqi; Ding, Honghui; Dong, Kai (5 January 2024), DeepSeek LLM: Scaling Open-Source Language Models with Longtermism, arXiv:2401.02954.
^ deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-LLM, DeepSeek, 27 January 2025, recovered 27 January 2025.
^ a b Dai, Damai; Deng, Chengqi; Zhao, Chenggang; Xu, R. X.; Gao, Huazuo; Chen, Deli; Li, Jiashi; Zeng, Wangding; Yu, Xingkai (11 January 2024), DeepSeekMoE: Towards Ultimate Expert Specialization in Mixture-of-Experts Language Models, arXiv:2401.06066.
^ Shao, Zhihong; Wang, Peiyi; Zhu, Qihao; Xu, Runxin; Song, Junxiao; Bi, Xiao; Zhang, Haowei; Zhang, Mingchuan; Li, Y. K. (27 April 2024), DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models, arXiv:2402.03300.
^ Wang, Peiyi; Li, Lei; Shao, Zhihong; Xu, R. X.; Dai, Damai; Li, Yifei; Chen, Deli; Wu, Y.; Sui, Zhifang (19 February 2024), Math-Shepherd: Verify and Reinforce LLMs Step-by-step without Human Annotations, arXiv:2312.08935. ^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Liu, Aixin; Feng, Bei; Wang, Bin; Wang, Bingxuan; Liu, Bo; Zhao, Chenggang; Dengr, Chengqi; Ruan, Chong (19 June 2024), DeepSeek-V2: A Strong, Economical, and Efficient Mixture-of-Experts Language Model, arXiv:2405.04434.
^ a b Peng, Bowen; Quesnelle, Jeffrey; Fan, Honglu; Shippole, Enrico (1 November 2023), YaRN: Efficient Context Window Extension of Large Language Models, arXiv:2309.00071.
^ “config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2-Lite at primary”. huggingface.co. 15 May 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2 at main”. huggingface.co. 6 May 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ DeepSeek-AI; Zhu, Qihao; Guo, Daya; Shao, Zhihong; Yang, Dejian; Wang, Peiyi; Xu, Runxin; Wu, Y.; Li, Yukun (17 June 2024), DeepSeek-Coder-V2: Breaking the Barrier of Closed-Source Models in Code Intelligence, arXiv:2406.11931.
^ “deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2.5 · Hugging Face”. huggingface.co. 3 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ a b c d e f g DeepSeek-AI; Liu, Aixin; Feng, Bei; Xue, Bing; Wang, Bingxuan; Wu, Bochao; Lu, Chengda; Zhao, Chenggang; Deng, Chengqi (27 December 2024), DeepSeek-V3 Technical Report, arXiv:2412.19437.
^ “config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 3 at primary”. huggingface.co. 26 December 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Jiang, Ben (27 December 2024). “Chinese start-up DeepSeek’s brand-new AI model outperforms Meta, OpenAI products”. South China Morning Post. Archived from the initial on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Sharma, Shubham (26 December 2024). “DeepSeek-V3, ultra-large open-source AI, surpasses Llama and Qwen on launch”. VentureBeat. Archived from the original on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Wiggers, Kyle (26 December 2024). “DeepSeek’s new AI design appears to be one of the very best ‘open’ oppositions yet”. TechCrunch. Archived from the original on 2 January 2025. Retrieved 31 December 2024.
^ “Deepseek Log in page”. DeepSeek. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ “News|DeepSeek-R1-Lite Release 2024/11/20: DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview is now live: releasing supercharged reasoning power!”. DeepSeek API Docs. Archived from the original on 20 November 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Franzen, Carl (20 November 2024). “DeepSeek’s very first thinking design R1-Lite-Preview turns heads, beating OpenAI o1 performance”. VentureBeat. Archived from the initial on 22 November 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Huang, Raffaele (24 December 2024). “Don’t Look Now, but China’s AI Is Catching Up Fast”. The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the initial on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ “Release DeepSeek-R1 · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-R1@23807ce”. GitHub. Archived from the initial on 21 January 2025. Retrieved 21 January 2025.
^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Guo, Daya; Yang, Dejian; Zhang, Haowei; Song, Junxiao; Zhang, Ruoyu; Xu, Runxin; Zhu, Qihao; Ma, Shirong (22 January 2025), DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs by means of Reinforcement Learning, arXiv:2501.12948.
^ “Chinese AI start-up DeepSeek surpasses ChatGPT on Apple App Store”. Reuters. 27 January 2025. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Wade, David (6 December 2024). “American AI has reached its Sputnik moment”. The Hill. Archived from the original on 8 December 2024. Retrieved 25 January 2025.
^ a b c Milmo, Dan; Hawkins, Amy; Booth, Robert; Kollewe, Julia (28 January 2025). “‘ Sputnik minute’: $1tn rubbed out US stocks after Chinese company reveals AI chatbot” – by means of The Guardian.
^ a b c d Hoskins, Peter; Rahman-Jones, Imran (27 January 2025). “Nvidia shares sink as Chinese AI app spooks markets”. BBC. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Goldman, David (27 January 2025). “What is DeepSeek, the Chinese AI start-up that shook the tech world?|CNN Business”. CNN. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ “DeepSeek positions a challenge to Beijing as much as to Silicon Valley”. The Economist. 29 January 2025. ISSN 0013-0613. Retrieved 31 January 2025.
^ Paul, Katie; Nellis, Stephen (30 January 2025). “Chinese state-linked accounts hyped DeepSeek AI launch ahead of US stock thrashing, Graphika says”. Reuters. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ 澎湃新闻 (22 January 2025). “量化巨头幻方创始人梁文锋参加总理座谈会并发言 ， 他还创办了” AI界拼多多””. finance.sina.com.cn. Retrieved 31 January 2025.
^ Shilov, Anton (27 December 2024). “Chinese AI company’s AI model advancement highlights limits of US sanctions”. Tom’s Hardware. Archived from the initial on 28 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ “DeepSeek updates – Chinese AI chatbot stimulates US market turmoil, wiping $500bn off Nvidia”. BBC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Nazareth, Rita (26 January 2025). “Stock Rout Gets Ugly as Nvidia Extends Loss to 17%: Markets Wrap”. Bloomberg. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Carew, Sinéad; Cooper, Amanda; Banerjee, Ankur (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek triggers global AI selloff, Nvidia losses about $593 billion of value”. Reuters.
^ a b Sherry, Ben (28 January 2025). “DeepSeek, Calling It ‘Impressive’ however Staying Skeptical”. Inc. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ Okemwa, Kevin (28 January 2025). “Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella touts DeepSeek’s open-source AI as “very remarkable”: “We must take the advancements out of China really, really seriously””. Windows Central. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Nazzaro, Miranda (28 January 2025). “OpenAI’s Sam Altman calls DeepSeek model ‘outstanding'”. The Hill. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Dou, Eva; Gregg, Aaron; Zakrzewski, Cat; Tiku, Nitasha; Najmabadi, Shannon (28 January 2025). “Trump calls China’s DeepSeek AI app a ‘wake-up call’ after tech stocks slide”. The Washington Post. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Habeshian, Sareen (28 January 2025). “Johnson bashes China on AI, Trump calls DeepSeek development “positive””. Axios.
^ Karaian, Jason; Rennison, Joe (27 January 2025). “China’s A.I. Advances Spook Big Tech Investors on Wall Street” – by means of NYTimes.com.
^ Sharma, Manoj (6 January 2025). “Musk dismisses, Altman applauds: What leaders say on DeepSeek’s disturbance”. Fortune India. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “Elon Musk ‘concerns’ DeepSeek’s claims, recommends huge Nvidia GPU infrastructure”. Financialexpress. 28 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Kim, Eugene. “Big AWS customers, including Stripe and Toyota, are hounding the cloud giant for access to DeepSeek AI designs”. Business Insider.
^ Kerr, Dara (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek hit with ‘large-scale’ cyber-attack after AI chatbot tops app stores”. The Guardian. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Tweedie, Steven; Altchek, Ana. “DeepSeek momentarily limited brand-new sign-ups, citing ‘large-scale destructive attacks'”. Business Insider.
^ Field, Matthew; Titcomb, James (27 January 2025). “Chinese AI has actually triggered a $1 trillion panic – and it does not care about complimentary speech”. The Daily Telegraph. ISSN 0307-1235. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b Steinschaden, Jakob (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek: This is what live censorship appears like in the Chinese AI chatbot”. Trending Topics. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b Lu, Donna (28 January 2025). “We tried DeepSeek. It worked well, up until we asked it about Tiananmen Square and Taiwan”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ “The Guardian view on a global AI race: geopolitics, development and the increase of chaos”. The Guardian. 26 January 2025. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Yang, Angela; Cui, Jasmine (27 January 2025). “Chinese AI DeepSeek shocks Silicon Valley, providing the AI race its ‘Sputnik minute'”. NBC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Kimery, Anthony (26 January 2025). “China’s DeepSeek AI positions powerful cyber, information personal privacy dangers”. Biometric Update. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Booth, Robert; Milmo, Dan (28 January 2025). “Experts advise caution over usage of Chinese AI DeepSeek”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Hornby, Rael (28 January 2025). “DeepSeek’s success has painted a big TikTok-shaped target on its back”. LaptopMag. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “Privacy policy”. Open AI. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Burgess, Matt; Newman, Lily Hay (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek’s Popular AI App Is Explicitly Sending US Data to China”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “Italy regulator looks for info from DeepSeek on data protection”. Reuters. 28 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Shalal, Andrea; Shepardson, David (28 January 2025). “White House evaluates impact of China AI app DeepSeek on nationwide security, official says”. Reuters. Retrieved 28 January 2025.