Sweepstakes Casino Controversy – And Celebrities’ All-important Role

The smiling faces of Paris Hilton and Ryan Seacrest made surprise looks before the Louisiana Senate for Friday’s hearing on illegal gaming.

No, they weren’t personally in presence, but the world-famous celebrities were conspicuously consisted of in a slide presentation on social and sweepstakes casinos – the questionable sites providing both totally free casino-style games and lucrative prizes, such as money, present cards or cryptocurrency. In one advertisement, the fist-pumping Seacrest is seen plugging Chumba Casino, where anybody can ‘bet free,’ while a crop-topped Hilton holds a chip for sweepstakes operator, Wow Vegas, in the other.

The websites are just 2 cogs in the multibillion-dollar market that now finds itself besieged by suits. In the eyes of many video gaming corporations, not to discuss lawsuit plaintiffs and state regulators, sweepstakes gambling establishments function as standard casinos, only without the oversight, customer protections and tax laws. So not only can they prevent the steep 24-percent federal sports betting levy, however sweepstakes operators aren’t based on regulative obstacles like anti-money laundering and responsible-gaming protections.

One operator, Australia-based Virtual Gaming Worlds (VGW), reported $4 billion in income in 2015 alone. Now the business faces allegations of prohibited sports betting in a New York suit that declares VGW utilizes celeb endorsers to ‘create a veneer of legitimacy’ around its item. (See VGW’s statement listed below)

‘I’m uncertain” if you do not trust us, you can rely on Paris Hilton” is a winning message for companies operating multibillion-dollar unlawful operations out of places like Malta, Isle of Man, or US mail drops,’ Friday’s presenter, Howard Glaser of video gaming corporation Light & Wonder, told DailyMail.com.

Sweepstakes endorsers consist of a range of celebrities from gambling lovers Drake and DJ Khaled to swimmer Michael Phelps, in addition to NBA stars Karl-Anthony Towns and Paul George – none of whom provide any distinctions in between traditional sports betting and sweepstakes play.

Paris Hilton is seen plugging Wow Vegas, one of lots of sweepstakes gambling establishments discovered online

Ryan Seacrest advises fans to play at Chumba Casino, where numerous – but not all – games are totally free

Drake has a deal with social sweeps casino, Stake, that he frequently touts on social media

Read More

Donald Trump ‘set to call NBA group owner as US ambassador to Italy’

Instead, advertisements usually center around the social aspect of the casinos, while leaving out the potential for actual gaming losses.

Others lure clients with promises of prizes. One such operator, Stake, ran a social networks advertisement revealing off Drake’s vehicles, planes and estates before pivoting to video of the rap artist playing online casino-style games.

‘Daddy, why do we have a lot cash?’ read the very first caption on the screen.

Another caption described: ‘Because I never ever quit.’

The discrepancy in between gambling sites and social or sweepstakes gambling establishments is a bit intricate, but operators of the latter insist they’re not included with the previous.

A spokesperson for a market trade group, the Social and Promotional Gaming Association (SPGA), discussed its members are not in direct competitors with online casinos and sportsbooks. Furthermore, according to SPGA information, most of the gamers on social-sweepstakes casinos are sports betting complimentary.

‘Most social sweeps consumers never ever purchase,’ the SPGA spokesperson informed DailyMail.com. ‘The minority of consumers who make purchases do so in quantities far smaller sized than the typical deposit or bet size at real-money online gambling sites.’

Social gambling establishments offer consumers a chance to play casino-style video games with friends. Players have the option to buy valueless currency frequently referred to as ‘gold coins,’ which can not be exchanged for genuine cash, however can be used to open various functions within the games.

But within the world of social gambling establishments exists sweepstakes gaming, enabling clients to obtain other currency called ‘sweeps coins’ that can be exchanged for cash or other prizes.

And therein lies the potential for financial losses, like the ones declared by plaintiffs in Florida, Georgia, New Jersey and New York City. One player informed the Washington Post he lost more than $100,000 on sweepstakes casinos in the previous year after continuing to buy more coins in pursuit of money and other things of value.

The Philadelphia 76ers’ Paul George is seen promoting an International Poker event

Social sweeps gambling establishment Stake ran an ad flaunting Drake’s cars and trucks, planes and mansions

Karl-Anthony Towns of the New York City Knicks is another NBA star plugging VGW’s Global Poker

Traditional online casinos are prohibited in all however seven states, which has helped to fuel the appeal of sweepstakes gambling establishments.

Anyone over the age of 18 can access the sweepstakes websites, which do not require usually need recognition. However, sites like Chumba will request for IDs from players trying to withdraw any funds.

Many sites, like the crypto-compatible Stake, allow customers to submit mail-in demands for complimentary sweeps coins, supplied the gamers follow painfully particular instructions. What’s more, players are typically rewarded with sweeps coins simply for signing up, consequently offering them a factor to attempt their hands at any variety of gambling establishment games for an opportunity to win – or lose – genuine money.

So why are sweepstakes sites permitted to operate in 48 states, while online gambling establishments are prohibited in all but 7?

According to the stakeholders, their product is the free casino-style video gaming, and the real-stakes competition is simply a way of promoting their support.

‘Social sweepstakes video games are merely a kind of online home entertainment,’ an SPGA representative informed DailyMail.com by e-mail. ‘No purchase is required to play at social gambling establishments with sweepstakes prizes. Consumers never have to spend for a chance to win rewards. That lack of a purchase requirement – or” consideration” – is an important distinction between social sweeps and standard online gaming sites like gambling establishments.’

Consider the manner in which McDonald’s utilizes its annual Monopoly game to promote its food: Customers aren’t paying to gamble, however rather they’re purchasing hamburgers and fries that offer them the opportunity to win lucrative prizes, such as a $1 million jackpot.

And without a purchase requirement, or ‘factor to consider’, the video game itself does not meet the definition of gaming in the US.

‘Sweepstakes are a long-standing technique for promoting all type of everyday services in the United States, whatever from hamburgers to magazine subscriptions to coffee and home improvement stores,’ the SPGA spokesperson informed DailyMail.com. ‘Sweepstakes promos are frequently utilized by a who’s who of household names like AT&T, Chase, Home Depot, Marriott, Starbucks, and Wal-Mart.’

But to numerous gambling market experts, that argument does not cut it.

For starters, gaming lawyer Daniel Wallach explains, McDonald’s Monopoly game doesn’t run forever. Rather, it has a well-defined beginning and end, consequently recommending the sweepstakes is not the fast-food giant’s primary product. Instead, the sweepstakes is being utilized to promote genuine items like fries, shakes, and the Filet-O-Fish.

‘They do not last permanently and they’re generally not connected to casino-style video games of possibility,’ Wallach told DailyMail.com. ‘They’re just cash free gifts.

‘The sweepstakes [gambling establishments] possess none of the qualities commonly associated with McDonald’s-style sweepstakes promotions,’ Wallach continued. ‘Besides running in all time, the sweepstakes gambling establishments use” casino-like” payments, typically 80 percent or more of earnings, whereas the common payout percentage for a short-lived marketing sweepstakes is an unimportant share of the earnings earned by the company [usually less than one percent]’

Wallach is quick to liken the online social sweeps casinos to the internet cafes that sprang up in Florida, using consumers the possibility to play casino-style games for genuine rewards. Much of those brick-and-mortar facilities have because been shuttered over accusations of unlawful sports betting.

DJ Khaled is among numerous celeb spokespeople for VGW’s Global Poker brand name

Now, Wallach argues, social sweeps gambling establishments need to face comparable analysis.

‘These differences are not arbitrary,’ Wallach said of social sweeps gambling establishments. ‘They have consistently been pointed out by courts and state attorney generals as essential factors in figuring out that a sweepstakes promo remained in fact a guise for unlawful gambling.’

One of the casino industry’s leading trade organizations, the American Gaming Association, is now pressing lawmakers to investigate sweepstakes operators and, in many cases, enact brand-new legislation on the problem.

‘Consumers are being denied of securities and states are giving up substantial tax and revenue chances as this sports betting replaces that carried out through controlled channels,’ read a well-circulated AGA memo.

And then there are the complainants who have taken legal action against social gambling establishments in more than a lots states.

Sweepstakes casino operators paid a combined $14.2 million in four different cases in Kentucky without admitting any misbehavior, according to the Washington Post. Meanwhile VGW agreed to pay $11.75 million in one class-action suit, saying the settlement was made to prevent legal expenses and continued litigation.

Michael Phelps has signed a handle the VGW Group, which owns Global Poker

In the latest suit, which is largely similar to its predecessors, New York state citizens Lamar Prater and Rebecca Pratt both claim to have actually lost well over $1,000 to VGW, which is described in the filing as an ‘unlawful gaming enterprise. ‘

Apple and Google have actually likewise been named as offenders in claims for hosting the sweepstakes sites. But unlike VGW, neither tech business reacted to DailyMail.com’s ask for remark.

‘We usually do not discuss matters before the courts,’ a VGW spokesperson told DailyMail.com via e-mail. ‘However, we note that this claim has only simply been filed with the court and VGW has actually not been formally served.

‘We have complete self-confidence in our compliance with all laws and policies where we run, and remain positive about the future,’ the representative continued. ‘We continue to provide our free-to-play video games throughout the majority of North America, as we have for more than a decade, developing not just excellent games, user experiences and entertainment, but likewise guaranteeing this is done securely, responsibly and at the greatest level of standards.

‘More broadly, we ‘d restate that class actions and other litigations and arbitrations are fairly typical across the online social video games industry (and the US more broadly), and our basic practice is that we intend to intensely protect any claim which might be brought against us.’

The problems in between conventional online gaming and sweepstakes gambling establishments could prove troublesome for some celebrity endorsers.

Towns, a star center with the Knicks, and the 76ers’ George both back VGW’s Global Poker brand while the NBA is partnered with standard video gaming titans like FanDuel and DraftKings.

‘It’s ironic that professional athletes are hawking illegal sports betting wagering ‘sweeps’ websites while at the very same time the leagues desire to forecast a strong stance versus prohibited gambling – specifically when trying to tamp down the scandal,’ Glaser told DailyMail.com.

It was simply 8 months ago that Toronto Raptors forward Jontay Porter got a lifetime restriction from the NBA over claims he conspired with bettors. However, to be clear, Porter’s scandal is unassociated to anything involving social or sweepstakes casinos.

Along with VGW, Apple and Google are being demanded hosting apparently illegal gambling sites

Regardless, Glaser sees sweepstakes casinos as a significant issue for leagues such as the NBA.

‘I ‘d expect that a league crackdown on athletes backing sweepstakes websites is a matter of when, not if,’ Glaser added.

Neither an NBA spokesperson nor the gamers’ agents responded to DailyMail.com’s ask for comment. For that matter, spokespeople for Drake, DJ Khaled, Hilton, Seacrest and Phelps likewise neglected to respond to DailyMail.com e-mails.

Asked if their celebrity endorsers have an obligation to explain to consumers the differences and resemblances between iGaming and sweepstakes gambling establishments, VGW insisted there is nothing more that needs to be done.

‘We have full self-confidence in our influencer and ambassadorial partnerships, and our business practices more broadly,’ the spokesperson said. ‘A few of our worths are” our players come first” and” we do what’s right”, and we put our values at the core of everything we do.’

Glaser, an outspoken opponent of sweepstakes sites, sees things differently.

‘Celebrities who lend their names to dubious prohibited sports betting websites are, at a minimum, putting their reputations at danger in addition to courting civil and class actions by customers who declare damage,’ Glaser said. ‘There is also some threat that state regulators and state lawyers basic rope celeb endorsers into enforcement efforts for assisting in illegal gaming.’

New YorkNBADrakeParis Hilton